1. Unpaid fees and invoices
A common situation involves a freelancer, consultant, developer, designer or other
professional who performs work for a Japanese company but does not receive the agreed
compensation.
Typical explanations include:
- “The deliverables were not satisfactory.”
- “Internal approval has not yet been completed.”
- “We will pay after our customer pays us.”
- “The project was cancelled.”
- “There was no formal written contract.”
Whether payment can be recovered depends on the agreement between the parties, what work
was performed and the evidence available.
A signed contract is helpful, but it is not always essential. Emails, Slack or other chat
messages, invoices, proposals, specifications and payment history can also become important
evidence.
Read more: Unpaid Freelance Fees in Japan →
2. Termination of freelance and consulting agreements
Foreign engineers, consultants and other professionals working in Japan are often engaged
under gyomu itaku agreements rather than employment contracts.
When the relationship ends suddenly, important questions include:
- Did the client have a contractual right to terminate?
- Was advance notice required?
- Was the agreement fixed-term or indefinite?
- Was there an alleged breach?
- Is compensation still payable for work already performed?
- Was the person truly an independent contractor, or could the relationship legally be
treated as employment?
Japan’s Freelancer Act may also apply to certain transactions between businesses and
freelancers.
For some engagements lasting six months or more, a business terminating or declining to
renew the engagement may be required, subject to exceptions, to provide at least 30
days’ advance notice.
However, the statutory notice obligation and the civil-law validity of a termination are
separate questions. A failure to provide statutory notice does not automatically mean that
the termination itself is legally invalid.
Read more: Contract Termination in Japan →
3. Stock options and equity disputes
Startup compensation frequently includes shares, stock options or promises of future
equity.
Disputes often arise when a foreign employee or executive leaves the company before an
IPO or acquisition.
“You will receive 2% of the company” does not necessarily establish
what legal rights have actually been granted.
The documents must be examined carefully.
Relevant materials may include:
- offer letters
- employment or consulting agreements
- stock option agreements
- shareholder resolutions
- board minutes
- cap tables
- vesting schedules
- leaver provisions
- emails or messages concerning the equity arrangement
One of the most important questions is whether stock options or shares were legally
issued, or whether the company merely promised to issue them in the future.
Read more: Stock Option and Equity Disputes in Japan →
4. Founder and business partner disputes
A disagreement between founders is rarely just one dispute.
It may simultaneously concern:
- share ownership
- voting rights
- management authority
- company bank accounts
- loans made by a founder
- intellectual property
- confidential information
- director positions
- customer relationships
- whether one founder should buy out another
The first step is therefore usually to identify which rights belong to the company and
which rights belong personally to each founder.
A commercial solution may involve a share transfer, resignation, repayment of founder
loans, transfer of intellectual property, release of claims and rules concerning future
competition or confidentiality.
Read more: Founder and Business Partner Disputes in Japan →
5. Loans and investment disputes
Money provided to a company or business partner can have very different legal
characteristics.
For example, JPY 10 million transferred to a startup could legally be:
- a loan
- payment for shares
- an investment under an investment agreement
- an advance
- a contribution to a joint venture
- money transferred under an informal agreement
This distinction matters.
A lender generally has a contractual claim for repayment when the loan becomes due.
An equity investor, on the other hand, does not ordinarily have the right to demand
repayment of the investment simply because the business performed poorly.
The legal basis for recovery must therefore be identified before making a demand.
Read more: Recovering Loans and Investment Money in Japan →